Strategic Designs Ltd., forums
http://www.startersorders.com/phpBB2/

RUK, ATR or other?
http://www.startersorders.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=6088		 Page 2 of 2
Author:  simpleminds [ Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: RUK, ATR or other?
Matt Chapman i hate him especially when patrick o'brady gets a winner he screams like a girl but i think CH4 racing is the best at the moment because of its HD coverage i'm wondering how long i have to wait before ATR gets HD i'm fed up with the picture quality and RUK is a rip off £20.00 for one channel is absolutely stupid when i pay £40 odd for hundreds of channel i tell you why its so expensive because it cant have many veiwers so have to pay higner price for it.
Author:  Ubar02 [ Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: RUK, ATR or other?
simpleminds wrote:
Matt Chapman i hate him especially when patrick o'brady gets a winner he screams like a girl but i think CH4 racing is the best at the moment because of its HD coverage i'm wondering how long i have to wait before ATR gets HD i'm fed up with the picture quality and RUK is a rip off £20.00 for one channel is absolutely stupid when i pay £40 odd for hundreds of channel i tell you why its so expensive because it cant have many veiwers so have to pay higner price for it.

Have to agree, c4 hd coverage is a cut above.
Author:  tombc [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: RUK, ATR or other?
For me RUK,is to expensive, i watch ATR,do have problems with some of the presenters though like Anubisrich's father i dislike chappers particlularly when he tries to tell the stewards jockey A did this jockey B didnt do this. Has the man ever sat on a racehorse i doubt it, so i have a good rant at the tele when he goes off on one. Perhaps your dad and i are in the same age group Anubisrich
Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/