Has any of you pitching in with your 2 cents worth noticed that this ^^^^ is where this started? It really was just a simple and honest question not aimed at anyone in particular. Bosra sham there really was no need for your condescending reply, "speed in pedigree, pretty much the opposite is true" lad you even made a point of highlighting the "also there is a lot of speed in his pedigree" bit in my original post - your words were proven wrong and its clear you didn't like that one bit (btw the bit in pink was a quote within a quote. not my words) (yes I realize this if you read it), but you dont want to be 'juvenile' about it so you come back and basically reiterate all the points you made the first time, just in a different colour. I can go back and re-answer all your 'secondary' points if you like?

As for beaky, anyone wanting to know what the 'point is'? - go back over his posts and and you'll see clearly there was/is no need for his aggressive nature, im going to continue to hop on his insignificant points until such a time comes that he realises like the rest of us (including me) that its just not clever, (i do realise that might take forever) thats just the way its going to be im afraid. Any of you have a problem with that then i suggest you consider where is appropriate to direct your frustrations.

Beaky you may have done a bet on Australia for the derby, but there are 421 horses left in the race... your unbeatable system requires you to have 397 of them backed. Entertaining indeed, clowns are entertaining too!