| Strategic Designs Ltd., forums http://www.startersorders.com/phpBB2/ |
|
| lightest? http://www.startersorders.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=9280 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Jesterlaugh [ Tue May 20, 2014 10:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | lightest? |
 this is my lightest at the moment i wondered how light any of you have seen? it seems all the big winner that you guys put on the forum are heavy weights 500kg+, how do you get them that heavy? and is that what makes the difference why i win nothing big? 
|
|
| Author: | Jesterlaugh [ Tue May 20, 2014 10:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: lightest? |
just raced him in a maiden he came 2nd and is now another 3kg lighter |
|
| Author: | ccfcpaul [ Thu May 22, 2014 9:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: lightest? |
Hey, interesting questions... I have a full stable of 100 horses, I haven't gone through them all but I did most.... weights range from 431-505 although most I viewed was 460-480 (mainly due to my horses in stud).... weights will fall after a race cos of the sweat and condition it loses and then rise again as it gets fitter. One thing I find strange is the build doesn't match weight as my 431 horse is an average build, whereas your 435 is a small build. The main plus for having a heavier/bigger horse is it should be stronger in a tussle... should be able to barge through a wall of horses easier, although ya could argue that smaller horses can get through smaller gaps easier. As far as i am aware tho, weight isn't an important value, it is more of a graphical value. I could be wrong tho. 
|
|
| Author: | pjrhodes1970 [ Fri May 23, 2014 4:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: lightest? |
ccfcpaul wrote: As far as i am aware tho, weight isn't an important value, it is more of a graphical value. I could be wrong tho. Correct i dont think it means anything most mine small builds |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|